I haven't got enough words to describe great positive impressions I get every time watching these video clips where one very cute and so sweet-looking teen chick with very long legs, not big but very attractive breasts and round bum gets fucked well by one hugecocked fellow right in a bathroom.
Yes, it's an anal sex web survey, so by definition it's mostly taken by the cool kids – but, since only what the cool kids thinks matters, it's a neat survey for anal lovers nonetheless. Hey, if only for the anal sex pie chart, you gotta check out this article:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/adult_products/sexuality/prweb4177964.htm
It goes by many names, and is giggled and whispered about, but anal sex has become an accepted part of the sexual repertoire. Besides being what many consider the ultimate taboo sex act, anal sex is enjoyed by nearly half of the adults in the United States.
Adam & Eve recently asked over 1,000 American adults how they felt about the controversial act of anal sex. Of the 68% who admitted they had tried it, 45% said they enjoyed it.
“We are pleased to note that most Americans now view anal sex as an accepted and normal part of sexuality,” says Chad Davis, Marketing Director for Adam & Eve. “For years, anal sex has had a bad reputation… it speaks well for the open-mindedness of Americans that it is now included as a healthy part of sexuality.”
Additionally, the survey revealed that of those adults who engage in anal sex, only 2.2% always include anal sex, while 7.6% said they include it often and 26.6% said they engage occasionally.
“Adam & Eve encourages American adults to get the facts on anal sex before adding it to their sexual activity,” says Davis. “We also promote a healthy, open attitude toward all types of lovemaking between consensual adults, and are pleased to see anal sex is an acceptable part of lovemaking for a number of adults.”
Well, I paraphrase, lol.
But she does say that her experience taking it up the ass for over 11 years shows that alarmist propaganda about anal sex is nonsense that isn't supported by the medical facts.
http://news.avn.com/articles/Belladonna-to-Light-Up-the-Loveline-401884.html
Bella said she may take the opportunity to challenge Loveline host Dr. Drew Pinsky's stance against anal sex. (Pinsky memorably commented to Sasha Grey during her appearance on The Tyra Banks Show that if she continued performing anal in her movies she would be "wearing diapers by the time you're 30.")
"He does probably have a very valid reason for believing that, but I'm almost 30, I've been doing anal sex for 11 years, and that's not how I feel," Bella said. "I think the big misconception is that people think you're doing it all day long, and every time you do it, you're doing it with these massive, large things, and that's just not the case. And like anything you do, you have to prepare yourself for it. You won't just go do a scene like that without preparing your body for it. It's like an athlete—they don't go to the Olympics without training themselves for it. It'll be interesting to have a conversation with someone about it. But it'll be fun."
I have tried to find any examples of cases in which people who are having anal sex in the ways in which it is normally had have actually ended up with some kind of anal sphincter damage. Pretty much every "expert" warns against it, usually with some anecdote about some gay guy they heard about with "anal leakage".
But, it is quite hard to find any substantive medical studies or examples of a woman having normal anal sex reporting any kinds of problems. And you would think with all the rightwing obsession with anal sex and their paranoia about anal sex that they would be trumpeting any actual cases or studies far and wide thru every corner of the mediasphere.
Here's what the wiki says – notthat one should trust the wiki, but, still, here is what it says:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_sex#Physical_damage
Physical damage to the rectum and anus can manifest as generalized ano-rectal trauma, hemorrhoids, anal fissures,[12] and rectal prolapse.[78] An insufficient amount of lubricant can make it especially painful or injurious.[79] Damage is more likely to occur if intercourse is forcible or aggressive or if alcohol or other drugs have dulled sensitivity.
Loss of control over the bowels, though rare according to some, is thought to be a valid concern[80] and is reported to be caused by repeated injury, or by the insertion of large objects,[81] or simply by regular anal sex, which "leads to internal sphincter dilation and soiling."[82]
A 1993 study published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine found that fourteen out of a sample of forty men receiving anal intercourse experienced episodes of frequent anal incontinence.[83] However, a 1997 study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology found no difference in levels of incontinence between homosexual men who engaged in anal sex and heterosexual men who did not, and criticized the earlier study for its inclusion of flatulence in its definition of incontinence.[84]
Dr. Jack Morin recommended kegel exercises to prevent loss of muscle tone from anal fisting or insertion of large objects in a presentation of clinical aspects of anal sexuality, delivered at the 1998 joint conference of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality and the American Association of Sex Educators. He added, however, that he had never personally observed "loosening" in any of his patients[85].
So, if anyone knows of any verified reports of anal damage from anal sex in women who have anal sex in a normal fashion (that is, women who are not prostitutes specializing in anal having it multiple times a day), please point me to that study.
I have to apologize for not writing about the anal lube study story earlier than this, I was busy with stuff and while I was reading all about it just didn;t get the time to blog.
Anyway, here's the quick summary – a recent study demonstrated the POSSIBILITY that most of the lubes we use for anal sex, including my favorite astroglide and second favorite KY liguid, may increase the chance of transmission of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, and other viral STDs. The effect has to be confirmed with studies of actual people, as I understand it.
The effect is caused by the salt properties of the water based lubes – they change the salt concentration against the cell walls causing the cell walls to be damaged and become more porous.
The study did not test silicone lubes, so no news on wether silicone anal lubes are better or worse.
The only lube that did not have this salt effect was one designed for women who wnat to get pregnant – a lube called Pre – which is chemically balanced to mimic the human bodys salt concentrations.
I think we can expect the major lube brands to offer new more expensive "safer" lubes this next year.
About.com had the best article I found on this new study and it's implications – so go read it.
The overall purpose of the study was to see if lubricant might play a role in increasing risk of STD transmission during anal intercourse. To this end, the researchers wanted to understand what, if any, direct damage lubricants might have on rectal and cervical tissue. They also wanted to see how the lubricants might impact healthy bacteria that are present in the rectum. There are, of course, many ways to damage rectal tissue. In this study the researchers focused on one particular effect which can damage the tissue in the rectum essentially by drying up cells, causing them to die and slough off. This can happen if the lubricant being used has higher concentrations of salts and sugars than are found in the skin cells it comes in contact with. The lubricant can draw water out of the cells, resulting in damage that can increase risk of infection (the science minded among you can find more detailed explanations here, here, or here).
They found that the four water based lubricants that had higher concentrations of salt (Astroglide, Elbow Grease, ID Glide, and K-Y Jelly) did in fact damage the outer layer of skin cells of the rectal and cervical tissue whereas the silicone lubricant and the water based Pre lubricant did not. In terms of how the lubricants impacted the healthy bacteria, they found that both Astroglide and KY Jelly had a negative effect (KY much worse than Astroglide) and that the other lubricants did not have a toxic effect.
A second study looked at the use of lubricants during anal intercourse outside the laboratory. This study included 229 men who had reported having receptive anal intercourse in the past month, and 192 women who reported having receptive anal intercourse in the past year. Participants completed a computer assisted self-interview about sexual behavior. Among other things, participants were asked about use (or non-use) of lubricants and the particular brands they used during anal sex. From that group, 302 participants also had rectal tests for chlamydia and gonorrhea. Most of the participants reported using lubricant the last time they had receptive anal intercourse. Of the 302 participants, 25 tested positive for an anal STD. More than two-thirds of the people diagnosed with an STD reported using lube the last time they had receptive anal intercourse, compared with one third of people who had not used a lube. Read another way, people who reported using lubricants the last time they had anal sex were about twice as likely to have chlamydia or gonorrhea as those who did not use lubricants.
Taken together, these two papers seem to be suggesting that using lubricants, or at least some kinds of lubricants, might actually be a bad idea when you're on the receiving end of anal intercourse. And if you listen to the press conference that followed the presentation of the data, it sounds like at least some of the researchers are comfortable interpreting this very early data with some significance.
But don't put away that lube bottle just yet (and probably you won't be putting it away ever). Remember that collecting data, interpreting it, and reporting on it are three very different activities. While some blog posts have suggested this is radical news, consider the fact that all of the reporting from the researchers themselves and from IRMA makes it clear that this is very preliminary research, and should be interpreted as such. It's actually the first research of it's kind, and it involved sample sizes too small to draw any significant conclusions from. It raises far more questions than it answers. Here are just a few:
The clinical study of people based on recall of past anal intercourse wasn't able to take into account which lubricants were used. Participants reported using many different kinds of lubricants across encounters, sometimes combining different lubricants in a given sexual encounter. If, as the laboratory study suggests, some lubes are better than others, we need to figure out which ones are better, and do they need to be used every time, in full concentration, to be "safer"?
I think it's interesting that some people are saying this study means anal sex is "better" without a lube – that seems problematic, considering the possible physical chafing. But I have said before here that human saliva, good old spit, makes a surprising good anal lube, if you can generate enough of it.
So, we may see a resurgence of anal spit lube, lol.
Free movies of hot young teen blond swallowing cock and taking analfuck. Sweet teenage girl Devon looks so naive and innocent in her little blonde pigtails but shes just a little anal slut piggy who loves to get her pert butt cheeks spread wide and her tight clampy litle anus pried open and stretched around an anal invader! She had her mouth wrapped around his big cock and she was brave enough to let him gag her good by pushing his cockhead all the way down her throat. Then she shyly got on her hands and knees and wiggled her butt and help open her own bumcheeks to let him know she wanted him to give her an analfuck. What would YOU do if am 18 year old glond girl was spreading her asscheeks and handing you a bottle of anallube? Would you bang that hot young asshole until she screamed and begged you to fuck FASTER - and when she cam her anus was loose and slowly closed after you pulled your cock out?
She called herself Natasha and claimed to be a half-goth raver chick. She got on her hands and knees on the bed, and let him put his big dick into her tight asshole, and she moaned and grunted as that anal feeling of discomfort turned to a surprising please that endlessly threatened to make her cum from being assfucked and officially become an anal girl forever after. She took that assfucking faster and faster untill her puckered anus relaxed and her rectum was naturally staying open and welcoming that cock into a teenage open anus .
This article about anal sex 101 is fairly sparse on the actual 101 part (and the anal sex part), but it might be of interest.
I liked her "what makes for good sex" paragraph – talking, lube, and laughter, thats damn good advice – for some people at least. Not everyone approaches anal sex the same way, and not every girl wants talking and laughter (use the lube tho).
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/jackalope/2010/06/shanna_katz_teaches_anal_101_a.php
In the anal class, everyone will write down myths they've heard. I'll talk about what a butt plug is, what anal beads are, and why lubricant is so important. I'll pass around different lubricants and talk about why they're good or not.
What makes for good sex?
I have three rules. One, communication is key. If you can't talk to the person you're having sex with, why are you having sex with them? The second thing I say is, "Lube is Love." And third, laughter. Sex is so awkward, and people make funny sounds and weird faces, and crazy things happen — like a dildo gets thrown across the room, or the kids walk in. You've got to be able to laugh. Plus, laughter releases endorphins, which makes the sex feel even better.
Mostly what the psychology today blogs say about anal sex is borderline garnage. The rest is usually complete garbage.
So seeing psychology today tackle the subject of ass2mouth, using Tiger Woods as a dead horse to beat, one expects the usual.
Psych today does not dissapoint:
- Switching from anal to oral is risky. Also according to the text messages, Tiger allegedly wanted to go from anal to oral with someone. This anal-oral switching potentially carries risks of various viruses, so not a great idea (fecal matter is not exactly clean stuff). If you want to try this safely, use a new condom for anal sex, then take it off afterwards, and make sure the penis is clean before you transition to oral. If you’re concerned about infection, use a new condom for anal and then another new condom for oral.
All true enough, FWIW. It just completely ignores the erotic power of ass to mouth, which has become a staple of anal porn movies.
How do all those porn girls do it?
1. They use enemas and eat little to nothing for 24 hours before the shoot to clean out their colon as much as possible. They also sometimes use laxatives. This leaves their rectum and colon as poop free as possible. They take several enemas just before the shoot, well, about an hour before.
2. A porn secret is that lots of porn girls are on heavy doses of antibiotics, which supposedly makes ttheir pussies taste great, and leaves their bowels much cleaner than average.
Still, that cock popping out of their ass probably doesn't smell and taste all that great. Anyone who has done anal sex knows that there is an earthy smell involved – and that some shit is to be expected in certain situations, and the skilled assfucker has paper towels and disinfectant wipes handy nearby, and NEVER, EVER makes a fuss over a little shit.
Never embarrass a girl by being shitphobic if you expect her to lift up her ass and let you fuck her there.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |